PEIA’s February Members’ Forum was more than a knowledge-sharing event — it became a conversation about how the pet and equine insurance ecosystem is evolving, where tensions exist, and where alignment is urgently needed.
Held at Browne Jacobson, the forum also marked PEIA’s first birthday, creating a natural moment for reflection alongside forward-looking discussion.
The CEO update acknowledged both momentum and responsibility.
Membership growth beyond 50 organisations within PEIA’s first year reflects strong industry engagement, yet the wider context remains challenging:
Pet insurance was positioned not as a niche line, but as:
“A mainstream personal lines product requiring mature, cross-sector dialogue.”
The update reinforced PEIA’s continuing purpose:
“Supporting sustainable, trusted insurance that protects animals, serves customers fairly, and works in partnership with veterinary professionals.”
Charlotte Halkett provided an update on PEIA’s Data & Insights initiatives, introducing two significant collaborative proposals.
Recognising that individual insurers rarely hold sufficient volumes of very large losses to model them robustly, the initiative proposes:
Charlotte noted:
“No one company has enough of the very large claims to produce truly robust actuarial modelling — collaboration reduces uncertainty for everyone.”
Charlotte emphasised the importance of credibility and transparency:
“Numbers that are incorrect without explanation are less helpful than not having a number at all.”
The Pet Paper aims to provide:
Dave Martin delivered a candid exploration of how veterinary practice has transformed over the past 15–20 years.
Rather than framing rising fees purely as inflation, the session highlighted structural shifts:
A defining observation resonated strongly:
“Modern veterinary care is not simply more expensive — it is fundamentally different.”
Dave also captured the paradox of client expectations:
“When pets are healthy, owners want simplicity. When pets are ill, they want every possible option.”
Phil McKinnon demystified the UK microchip and database ecosystem.
Clarifications included:
Phil highlighted:
“A microchip is an identifier — the intelligence sits within the databases and the governance around access and consent.”
The session explored realistic insurer opportunities:
Rick Faucher introduced members to North America’s association-led approach.
Discussion focused on:
Rick reflected:
“Strong associations accelerate market maturity, credibility, and constructive regulatory dialogue.”
He also reinforced the shared ambition across markets:
“Sustainable, trusted pet insurance ultimately improves outcomes for pets and their owners.”
Mark Pilkington delivered an engaging, case-led session examining liability under the Animals Act 1971.
Key insights:
Mark described the legislation as:
“Cumbersome, opaque — yet still critically important for claims outcomes.”
A sobering reminder followed:
“Underinsurance, or no insurance at all, can leave owners personally exposed and claimants without remedy.”
Joining remotely, Tim Johnson explored policy clarity through regulatory and linguistic lenses.
Themes included:
Tim observed:
“Complexity is not neutral — it directly affects complaints, trust, and enforceability.”
Against the Consumer Duty backdrop:
“Clarity is no longer a ‘nice to have’ — it is central to customer outcomes and regulatory compliance.”
The forum concluded with a cross-speaker panel discussion where conversations converged around:
The February Forum reflected a sector moving beyond surface debate:
PEIA extends sincere thanks to:
Browne Jacobson for hosting
Guidewire for sponsoring PEIA’s First Birthday Celebration
All speakers and panellists
Members and guests for their continued engagement
Future forums will continue exploring:
Claims, Fraud & Complaints
AI – the Consumer, Animal Journey & Guard Rails
Vulnerable Customers
Veterinary Engagement
27 Old Gloucester Street, London, WC1N 3AX
VAT number 509422109
Company number 16176404
Great event – thanks again for attending!